It’s not what you say, it’s the way that you say it. The panel game, Just a Minute depends on it. My granddaughter (aged 6) wrote a performance poem about the programme. I have kept the original spelling:-
This is
Cklap, cklap, cklap
A game of
Cklap, cklap, cklap
Consontrashon
Clap, clap, clap
No repeets
Clap, clap, clap
Or hesetaison
Clap, clap, clap
I’ll go first
Clap, clap, clap
And I’ll go second
Clap, clap, clap
Subject is
Clap, clap, clap
Enithing.
By GT
Jan 2020
The converse of Just a Minute
Bringing together that Just a Minute, a reading of Microcosmographia Academica by FM Cornford (1908) and listening to politicians talk about COVID-19 I realised that political talk is precisely the opposite of the panel game.
A political interview will last three, five, or fifteen minutes during which time there must be the maximum hesitation, deviation and repetition together with obfuscation. The skill lies in making ten words do the duty of one. There are words and phrases which can be strung together, which will give the speaker an additional ten seconds thinking time, eg. ‘I’m delighted you asked that question, it is a very important subject and perceptive of you to ask, What the British people need to know is…’ That is at least ten seconds wasted. Another good ploy is to ask, ‘I didn’t quite get that. Could you repeat the question, please?’ While fiddling with your earpiece.
Then there are new concepts like ‘good British Common Sense.’ Common sense is good anyway, so that is a tautology. How does British Common Sense differ from any other nationality’s Common Sense? Recently Welsh and Scottish Common Sense seem to have developed differently from English.
Cornford’s Political Principles
Cornford wrote of aspiring politicians:- If you will be a politician, you will have a painful path to follow, even though it be a short one, before you nestle down into a modest incompetence. My heart is full of pity for you. I pity those standing behind those lecterns in the dull, wood-panelled room with the hideous carpet. The red and yellow or green and yellow decals look like a warning of a hole in the road. Our politician holds the lectern as if standing on the edge of the hole with the ground crumbling beneath him.
Most aspiring politicians tell you that they want to get things done to make a better world. Once they are in power, their aim is to do nothing because change upsets people and they will be criticised for it. Cornford explains, with delightful light humour, how to stop things getting done.
There are examples of Cornford’s ‘Principle of Unripe Time’. Time is no longer ripe to discuss international figures of COVID mortality even though we have been feeding on them for the last 8 weeks. The hope is that, when the time is ripe, the fruit will have gone rotten and nobody will be interested.
Cornford spoke of the Principle of the Dangerous Precedent which boils down to – nothing should ever be done for the first time.
Role of Scientists
Scientists are helping the government these days. CP Snow would be pleased about that. It is now 60 years since his famous lecture on The Two Cultures. These guys know their stuff, but they also know not to interrupt or contradict. They understand models, but politicians do not. Everyone who has used computers knows the GIGO rule, Garbage in – Garbage out. It is an indictment that the cabinet cannot supply a scientist of its own. There are only two cabinet ministers with science degrees out of twenty-four.
To combat the COVID-19 virus, we need to know about its biology. We know some things, but there is a lot yet to learn. From a knowledge of biology, you can work out what is best for you to do and what is best for society to do. There are capable scientists other than the government ones. It would be good to see them debate issues. Scientific debate is essential for getting at the truth.
Chippy Minton says
Yes, the delaying tactics are very evident in the daily Covid-19 briefings. I’ve noticed that American interviewees will often bring family (either theirs or the questioners) into their response too. Often a politician will have a point they want to make, and will make that point irrespective of whether it answers the question asked.
However, I also get irritated at interviewers who keep pressing for an answer after the interviewee has said something along the lines of “I don’t have enough information to answer that”.
I don’t think we seem to have the same calibre of politicians that we used to. Today’s politicians do seem to be more concerned with their own fame and fortune than making a difference. Look how quickly the political leaders run to the sunset when they lose an election. What happened to the Heaths and Wilsons who stayed on to fight another election or, when they retired from office, stayed on the backbenches? “A politician looks to the next election; a statesman looks to the next generation”
Mike Sedgwick says
Yes, interviewers ask pretty dumb questions at times. I like the apocryphal – “Apart from that, Mrs Lincoln, did you enjoy the play?”
(Abraham Lincoln was assassinated while attending the theatre with his wife in 1865.)
chippy minton says
It may be aprocryphal, but I could quite believe an interviewer in 2020 asking something similar.